(2017) 3 Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr. 106–111
doi
Title of the article	Features of Material Objects as Evidence Seizure in the Course of Search and Review
Author(s)	IRYNA KRYTSKA PhD student, criminal procedure department, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, ira24kritskaya@gmail.com
Short title of the journal (ISSN)	Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr.
Year	2017
Issue	3
Pages	[106–111]
Language	Ukrainian
Abstract	On the basis of a system analysis of individual methods of collecting physical evidence in criminal proceedings, certain aspects of the withdrawal of material objects during the search and inspection are explored. Based on the normative provisions and the results of the generalization of judicial practice, the author identifies conflicts and gaps in the regulatory regulation and formulates proposals for improving the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine in this direction.
Keywords	physical evidence; temporary withdrawal; seizure of property; inspection; search.
References	REFERENCES 1. Ukhvala Kyivskoho raionnoho sudu mista Kharkova [The Decision of the Kyiv District Court of the Kharkiv City] vid 11 travnia 2016 roku u spravi № 640/7404/16-k, provadzhennia № 1-ks/640/3907/16 (Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen). URL: (in Ukrainian). 2. Shylo O.H. Aktualni pytannia zastosuvannia areshtu maina v kryminalnomu provadzhenni [The Topical Issues of Arresting Property in Criminal Proceedings]. Pravove zabezpechennia operatyvno-sluzhbovoi diialnosti: aktualni problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia: nauk.-prakt. seminar [The Legal Support of Operational and Service Activities: the Actual Problems and Ways of the Solution: scien.-practice workshop]. Kharkiv, 2016. Vyp. 7. P. 375–378 (in Ukrainian). 3. Myroshnychenko Yu.M. Problemni pytannia tymchasovoho vyluchennia y areshu maina za novym kryminalno-protsesualnym zakonom [The Problematic Issues of Temporary Seizure and Asset Seizure under the New Criminal-Procedural Law]. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo. 2013. № 3/2. P. 310–312 (in Ukrainian). 4. Smokov S., Lisnichenko D. Tymchasove vyluchennia ta aresht maina: dokaz chy zakhid zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia? [The Temporary Seizure and Arrest of Property: Evidence or Measure to Ensure Criminal Proceedings?]. Pravo Ukrainy. 2015. № 5. P. 163–170 (in Ukrainian). 5. Ukhvala Apeliatsiinoho sudu Chernihivskoi oblasti [The Decision of the Court of Appeal of Chernihiv Region] vid 30 veresnia 2016 roku u spravi [case] № 751/9071/ 16-k, provadzhennia № 11-ss/795/332/2016 (Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen). URL: (in Ukrainian). 6. Ukhvala Lutskoho miskraionnoho sudu Volynskoi oblasti [The Decision of the Lutsk City Court of Volyn Region] vid 22 hrudnia 2015 roku u spravi [case] № 161/19133/15-k, provadzhennia № 1-ks/161/5133/15 (Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen). URL: (in Ukrainian). 7. Ukhvala Starovyzhivskoho raionnoho sudu Volynskoi oblasti [The Decision of the Starovizhiv District Court of the Volyn Region] vid 19 hrudnia 2016 roku u spravi [case] № 168/824/6-k, provadzhennia № 1-ks/168/257/16 (Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen). URL: (in Ukrainian). 8. Kailo I. Yu. Dopustymist dokaziv u kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy [The Admissibility of Evidence in the Criminal Procedure Process of Ukraine] (dys. kand. yuryd. nauk; Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho). Kharkiv, 2016. 218 p. (in Ukrainian).